TIME Magazine on “The Religion Test”
A recent article in TIME Magazine by Nancy Gibbs (entitled “The Religion Test” in the print magazine and “Romney’s Mormon Question” on the Web site) examines whether a political candidate’s religious beliefs are appropriate criteria to consider in a political contest. While the article focuses mostly on Mitt Romney’s bid for the presidency, it discusses the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and cites a few authorities that warrant some response.
Ms. Gibbs’ article was generally accurate with respect to the beliefs of the LDS Church. One small comment that was misleading, however, was the claim that members of the Mormon church refer to members of other faiths as “gentiles.” While this term may have been used in decades past, it is certainly not what “non-Mormons are called.” The word “gentile” is a Biblical term referring to groups of people other than the Jews. This definition of the word would place all Christians in the “gentile” category, regardless of their membership in a particular denomination. Leaders of the Church of Jesus Chirst of Latter-day Saints have counseled members of the church to avoid even terms like “nonmember” or “non-Mormon” because they could be seen as demeaning or offensive.
In the article, Ms. Gibbs dredges up Slate editor Jacob Weisberg’s claims that Mormonism is “a modern hoax,” and that he could not vote for anyone who believed it. Under Mr. Weiberg’s criteria, citizens of the United States are free to believe what they want to, as long as they don’t intend to run for public office. This notion is plainly contrary to the constitutional principles upon which the United States was founded. LDS doctrine reaffirms the right of all people to believe as they wish, not just those who share its beliefs. The Eleventh Article of Faith states:
We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may.
Mr. Weisberg’s suspicion of religion does not render personally religious people unqualified for public office, regardless of their beliefs. Indeed, rather than disqualifying a candidate from office, one’s personal convictions could lead to many desireable attributes such as compassion, honesty, and integrity.
The TIME Magazine article can be read here.